Part I of this volume includes five chapters related to the practice of OCTS. This is a field of research I embarked on when I first began my academic career in 1984. This was the same year in which the Sino-British Joint Declaration was signed. As the only local Chinese member of the academic staff of the Faculty of Law at that time (all other law teachers at the University of Hong Kong being expatriates), I considered it my mission to research the constitutional and legal issues faced by Hong Kong in its era of transition leading up to the handover in 1997, including concerns that arose during the drafting of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) that would be established. Most of my writings in the 1980s were, therefore, focused on such issues.
Hong Kong constitutional law, the Basic Law, and the jurisprudence of OCTS continued to be a main area of my research in the 1990s and in the post-1997 era. In my writings (in both English and Chinese), I tried to document and provide commentary and analysis on major constitutional developments and leading constitutional law cases decided by the Hong Kong courts since the HKSAR was established in 1997. My research orientation is based on what I believe to be a balanced approach to the study of OCTS, taking into account both the “sovereignty” claims of the Central Government in Beijing and the “autonomy” and “democracy” aspirations of the people of Hong Kong, and aiming at an objective study of relevant legal developments.
Chapter 1 of this volume introduces the constitutional and legal issues arising from the practice of OCTS in the HKSAR by reviewing key developments from the time of the establishment of the HKSAR in 1997 to the close of the first decade of the twenty-first century. It covers major episodes such as the “right of abode” controversy that led to the first ever interpretation of the Hong Kong Basic Law by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) and the failed attempt to implement article 23 of the Basic Law. Chapter 2 reviews the development of Hong Kong’s political system since colonial times and analyses the political, constitutional, and legal controversies that culminated in the “Occupy Central Movement” of 2014. The OCTS model was premised on the “high degree of autonomy” the HKSAR was promised by the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984. Thus, Chapter 3 studies various aspects and elements of the autonomy enjoyed by the HKSAR under the Basic Law in the context of general theories and considerations of autonomy as an internationally prevalent constitutional arrangement. Chapter 4 looks at the complex relationship between law and social movements both as a matter of general theory and in the context of the HKSAR. Finally, Chapter 5 brings readers up-to-date by discussing the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement of 2019, which brought about the most serious challenge for OCTS to date.
