Well worth a read ..
There is no doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized many industries, the legal sector among them. Furthermore, it will continue to do so in the foreseeable future in ways that we haven’t even begun to comprehend. However, I fear that its promise of solving and revolutionizing every single legal challenge or area is often overstated, especially when it comes to Foreign, Comparative, and International Legal (FCIL) research. AI promises of easiness, rapidity, and exclusively results-oriented approaches fundamentally clash with FCIL work, which demands robust research steps, awareness of processes, and a sense of curiosity in a globalized world that is continuously (d)evolving. Comparative Law, in particular, requires a mindset rooted in cultural immersion that is not frozen in time, but responsive to historical and ongoing changes.
At a fundamental level, the volatile nature of legal information access in most countries in the world further complicates the picture. Many countries still do not have digitized legal datasets, despite the major strides accomplished in the1990s and early 2000s with the proliferation of Legal Information Institutes (LIIs) across the world and the Free the Law Movement. Furthermore, governments may restrict or remove previously available legal materials or actively censor access to legal information, making it imperative for legal professionals to stay informed about these, at times abrupt, changes. This landscape creates significant gaps that AI cannot bridge alone, leaving legal professionals to confront a sobering reality: much of the critical legal information remains offline and inaccessible.
Access to Legal Information is usually understood to be part of broader concepts such as Access to Justice and Freedom of Information (FOI) or Right to Information (RTI) Laws. Important civil society groups in these areas such as World Justice Project (WJP), Article19 and Transparency International have all reported on the rapid deterioration on access to legal information globally and in some individual countries, in particular. For example, the World Justice Project has issued a yearly report called the Rule of Law Index since 2015 tracking several factors in almost all countries around the world. One of these factors defined by WJP as crucial to the rule of law is open government which includes publicized laws and government data and right to information. Based on the data provided, open government is one of the factors which continues to decrease every year, even in countries with RTI laws. Unreliable access to legal and government data does not bode well for AI tools relying solely on these datasets.
Read the full article at
The Limits of AI for Your Foreign and Comparative Legal Research Needs
