The lawyer was reportedly offered highly sought-after overseas secondments despite having been disciplined for sexually harassing colleague Fiona Thatcher.
The identity of the lawyer who was disciplined for sexually harassing a female colleague at Australian law firm Allens and was subsequently promoted has been revealed as Timothy Leschke.
A person with knowledge of the incident confirmed his identity.
Read the full story at https://www.law.com/international-edition/2021/04/06/identity-of-australian-lawyer-who-harassed-colleague-revealed/
Also see the AFR
Reddit Aus law has this comments trail
Oh, shit, names are being named now?
Well, this is going to appear great on that guy’s Google results for the next decade.
He did out himself to colleagues in a brief speech on Monday, though most in the firm already knew who he was after the Australian article (which did not name him).
Apparently he had to becos others were being suspected. A loose acquaintance of mine who works there had a list of 5 suspects and Leshke wasn’t even on it… I read down below that everyone at allens knew who it was but I used to work there at a different office and none of my circle knew.
Think they were good friends. He’d probably been there before.
6 days ago·edited 6 days ago
Goggle Compunerds
“Leschke? More like LECH-Y amirite?”
Remember that Big Law John guy who banged on about how the secretaries were better in Colombia?
He was right. This kind of thing just isnt worth it in Australia (anymore) NOT CONDOMING IT AT ALL
He was not required to undertake any form of specialised training
Do other people think that this “training” that so many people seem to be going through is of any use in this setting?
Undercover Chief Judge, County Court of Victoria6 days ago
That sort of training might be merited for ambiguous conduct which inadvertently caused offence. It could help address gaps in perspective which led to the issue.
Something like this, though, has no ambiguity – it’s outright harassment which could well have been dealt with via a complaint to police.
Nope. The problem is not that people don’t know what good is. The problem is the heart.
If we are going to ask perpetrators to change, rather than ask victims to be more careful, then we need to be less cynical about efforts to reform. However, we can still ask if particular training is effective.
I’ve worked with horrible toxic abusive people (in medicine) and in my experience they never got better…and of course pre-2021, at least you could just continue the behaviour forever, on the basis that any complainant would never as they say “work in this town again”
Vibe check6 days ago
How do people even manage to not resist doing this kind of stupid behaviour – even when drunk?
Probably because they know they can get away with it, like this guy did and many others like him have.
Probably because they’re creepy men running on egocentric sexual desire who feel entitled to demand sex.
It’s so much easier to make sense of the world when you understand that law firms have no purpose or values other than making money. Everything they say to the contrary are lies designed to increase profitability. This is why they need to have change forced upon them. They will never change themselves
How does that even apply here? The guy was an associate. What kind of associate has any kind of value to the firm that can’t be replaced by a lateral hire / half decent baby solicitor getting promoted? I’ve never met an associate who is bringing in top-tier clients. None of this makes sense even from the perspective of ruthless law firm logic.
Ive read everything I could find on this as I used to work at Allens (different office) ans i have some connections there now. He is one of the highest billing lawyers in Brisbane, known for being a work slave. The biggest profit margins at these firms come from the high billing associates which he would have been at the time. It makes sense they would have wanted to keep him
It’s the vibe of the thing6 days ago
I guess they’ve invested time and training into him? Maybe they didn’t want to go to market for his role? Maybe he was well-connected and had partner potential for bringing in clients? I agree with you, this is what I first thought when I read this article. Surely there is something that we aren’t seeing.
The only possible “excuse” was if he was a relative of a major client. Partner potential any generically being well connected ain’t enough even from a pure business perspective. But even then, the amount of work any individual can direct to a T6 firm in the scale of their overall revenue is not massive.
I have seen a law firm take action some yers ago with a lawyer being dismissed over drunk behaviour at an after work function, so ya know some firms take it quite seriously, and not are all the same I believe.
It does got taken seriously, but the question of how profitable the particular employee is seems to always show up in the final outcome.
Wednesbury unreasonable6 days ago
That is so at odds with the law firm responses I’ve witnessed, though it is reassuring to know there is the occasional firm that gets it right
It boggles the mind that this guy got off with a slap on the wrist in 2015. This is something he ought to have been reported to the police for, not just HR. Were social standards really so different 6 years ago that this wasn’t seen as a career limiting move?
Wednesbury unreasonable6 days ago
It is sadly not at all mind boggling. It is standard practice and remains so today.
Yes, the fact that he even went to her house to agressively demand sex would have been terrifying for the woman. Should have been reported to police, for sure.
I think the response of the firm’s still depends on the risk v reward calculation – risk of exposure v how valuable the perpetrator is to the forms bottom line. The risk has probably gone up a bit in the last few years as more junior lawyers have been willing to speak up, but I don’t believe there’s any actual change in the morality of law firms. They’ll still do whatever they think they can get away with.
No senior associate in a T6 firm has a material contribution to the firm’s bottom line. If he wasn’t immediately dismissed, he should have been managed out. Letting him stick around for the next six years sends a clear signal that Allens doesn’t care about this sort of stuff.
There is borderline conduct which is not okay which maybe shouldn’t be a job ending move meriting the kind of response, but repeatedly texting someone for sex over a 12 hour period and then showing up at their house ain’t it.
Wednesbury unreasonable6 days ago
They’ll still do whatever they think they can get away with.
I recently reviewed a file note I’d taken when I complained about sexual harassment at a law firm some years ago.
After meeting with a partner to raise the issue, my file note concluded “[Partner name] will do as little about this as I am willing to accept”.
I don’t think there was much calculation besides them thinking it’s not that big a deal.
It’s not seen as a career limiting move today. The standards are exactly the same.
You’ve been downvoted by someone, but I know of someone who in the last year or two was “managed out” (not fired) for repeatedly sexually harassing a junior (who ironically got in trouble for lashing out in retaliation after eventually getting fed up of this shit). Guess what the consequence on their career was? A move from a mid tier to a top tier.
I’m used to being downvoted for pointing out that there are never repercussions in this space. There are some people here that sadly reflect the conservative nature of law more broadly.
7 days ago·edited 1 hour ago
Global law firm Allens promoted senior associate Timothy Leschke through its ranks and offered him highly sought-after overseas secondments despite internally disciplining him for sexually harassing a junior lawyer in his team.
Mr Leschke also retained oversight of junior female staff members within his Brisbane-based team after the harassment despite the firm having disciplined him for sexual harassment.
But Allens has stood by its response despite acknowledging its processes for handling such complaints have “evolved significantly” into a “better system” since the incident. Mr Leschke said he deeply regretted his conduct and had changed since.
Fiona Thatcher, who was then a junior lawyer in the same infrastructure projects team as Mr Leschke, said he harassed her late on a Friday night in July 2015 when he sent her a series of text messages suggesting she have sex with him.
He then showed up at her apartment complex and continuously rang her security buzzer for five minutes. The following morning at 11.00am, she got another text making similar suggestions. He had a girlfriend at the time.
Ms Thatcher formally complained to the firm the next Monday, backed up by a statement from her father, who had been at her apartment at the time, identifying Mr Leschke.
While the firm found Mr Leschke had sexually harassed Ms Thatcher as she reported, it accepted his explanation that he was drunk at the time and “formally disciplined” him by giving him a warning and telling him to apologise to her and work from home for a week.
During the two-day investigation, he told the firm he had deleted the texts when drunk, an explanation the firm accepted. While he had also texted her on the Saturday, Ms Thatcher said that her concerns he was lying were dismissed. He denied lying.
He was not required to undertake any form of specialised training and has continued to have oversight of young women in his team – then as an associate, and now as a senior associate – since the incident.
Ms Thatcher was allowed to move to an office that did not directly neighbour his after the incident, but she was required to remain in his team. She left the firm five months later.
Allens also did not report him to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner, despite sexual harassment breaching solicitors’ legally binding professional obligations to the court. Ms Thatcher reported him last week.
While firms are historically reticent to report high-earning staff to the commissioner, it is not unprecedented. Herbert Smith Freehills reported – and fired – rainmaker partner Peter Paradise, despite his value to the firm, after finding he had sexually harassed staff members.
To Ms Thatcher, the firm’s response revealed a culture that prioritised money over staff wellbeing, tapping into a growing movement of junior staff at corporate law firms who are pushing back on the legal industry’s tough culture.
“The messages that continue to be sent to me, and to other women and to Tim as well, from the firm is that ‘we don’t care about women as much as we care about how much someone bills’,” she said.
“It says that ‘you’re not as valuable as someone who can make us a lot of money, and we will protect them’. Think of what that does to someone’s confidence, think of the harm that causes.”
Cultural problems
Her warning comes after the legal industry was rocked last year by revelations that former High Court justice Dyson Heydon repeatedly harassed female associates while on the bench.
A recent study by the International Bar Association also found 47 per cent of women lawyers in Australian firms had been sexually harassed, outstripping the global average of one third.
“There’s a culture where you basically get abused when you’re in your first, second, third year, with a culture where all that matters is how much you work and how technically proficient you are, and you’re managed by people who are good lawyers but don’t have emotional intelligence,” Ms Thatcher said.
“So it makes this environment where this is a rite of passage and it seems normal that there’s constantly people crying in the women’s bathroom, and if you don’t fit in with that then you are seen as just not being able to hack it.
“It’s just this factory line of high-achieving young men and women who get spat back out broken, and that’s just so sad. Where is the accountability for that?”
Mr Leschke told AFR Weekend he “deeply regretted” his conduct towards Ms Thatcher and “unreservedly apologised” to her.
“No one should have to tolerate conduct of that nature. My actions were inexcusable and well below the standards expected of a decent human being,” he said.
He said he realised the “inexcusable nature” of his conduct immediately after the incident and had sought to hold himself to a higher standard since.
“It is possible for people to make bad mistakes, learn from them and change,” he said, adding that men needed to “take responsibility for addressing this issue”.
The senior associate outed himself on Monday to colleagues in the Brisbane office as the lawyer referred to in an article in The Australian that first mentioned the allegations without identifying him on March 19.
AFR Weekend understands he was greeted with applause but that some female staff members were upset by the response.
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio added that “sexual harassment has no place in any workplace” and the firm had learnt a lot from Ms Thatcher’s case.
“Our internal frameworks and processes for managing allegations and consequences of harassment have evolved significantly since 2015,” he said.
”We want these frameworks to ensure that staff have confidence that they can raise any complaints and that they will be handled appropriately; that there is appropriate transparency regarding the disciplinary measures imposed on those who engage in misconduct; and that we have the right support for victims of misconduct following an event.
“We have learnt from this incident and have incorporated the learnings into what we believe is a better system for managing issues such as this.”
Promotions
Mr Leschke was made senior associate in 2019 despite the substantiated harassment claim against him, and AFR Weekend understands he is currently also under consideration for a promotion to managing associate in its July promotion round.
Allens uses this position to progress senior associates they believe will soon make partner, and Mr Leschke’s promotion would come ahead of the usual rate of progression within the firm.
Mr Leschke has also been offered two highly sought-after secondments to Allens Linklaters offices in New York and Dubai since the harassment.
The firm previously said he was promoted on the basis that his conduct since July 2015 had been “everything the firm expects”, with his performance of “a very high standard”. There have been no complaints made about him since Ms Thatcher’s.
But under its enhanced “consequence management” processes for responding to harassment claims, Allens is looking at how misconduct could contribute to career progression and promotion.
AFR Weekend understands he was greeted with applause
for a moment i legitimately thought i was on r/thathappened
AFR Weekend understands he was greeted with applause
Spoiler – it was all the men clapping.
So brave.
It wasn’t. A woman started the clap. None of the men (or women) in my immediate vicinity clapped. The clap was very short and awkward. Of course any applause was still absolutely inappropriate.