The Financial Times reports
Pro-Beijing legislators have successfully intervened for the first time in a senior judicial appointment in Hong Kong, in what lawyers said was the latest attack on the city’s cherished independent legal system.
Justice Maria Yuen, the wife of Geoffrey Ma, the city’s previous chief justice, was set to be appointed as the next permanent judge on Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal, two people familiar with the events told the Financial Times.
But she withdrew her candidacy for the city’s top court after legislators raised concerns over the appointment, the people said. The lawmakers argued that Yuen might be influenced by her husband, who pro-Beijing groups criticised in the past after he defended the neutrality of Hong Kong’s judiciary, according to a person with knowledge of their thinking.
(snip)
Yuen’s appointment was recommended last year by the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission, a semi-independent body that considers judicial positions in Hong Kong, and was expected to be approved by Carrie Lam, the city’s chief executive, the two people familiar with the events said.
(snip)
But before Yuen’s recommendation was finalised and formally sent to the legislature for confirmation, pro-Beijing lawmakers including Holden Chow and Elizabeth Quat raised concerns.
The legislature’s panel on administration of justice and legal services, which is dominated by pro-Beijing lawmakers, asked the judiciary and government officials for discussions on the appointment.
Aside from their objection that Ma might continue to have an influence on the court through Yuen, the legislators also said that she took a long time to hand down judgments, according to a person with knowledge of their thinking.
The politician’s inquiries led to Yuen withdrawing her nomination, according to two people with knowledge of the events, the first known case of its kind. Yuen directed all requests for comment on the incident to the judiciary, which declined to elaborate.
The commission subsequently selected another judge, Johnson Lam, who is set to be appointed.
(snip)
Insiders said Lam was not seen as more conservative or liberal in his judgments than Yuen, nor was there evidence that lawmakers had acted on Beijing’s orders in Yuen’s case.
But senior legal figures were concerned the Yuen case could set a precedent for the Legislative Council, which is dominated by pro-Beijing politicians, to formally review judicial appointments. This in turn could undermine the authority of the JORC, the judicial appointment committee.
