As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into the legal sector, the question of legal liability and the ability to sue AI law firms is increasingly relevant. Below is an expert analysis of the current legal landscape regarding suing AI law firms or those using AI in legal practice.
Who Is Liable for AI-Generated Legal Advice?
Under current legal principles, if a client receives incorrect or negligent legal advice that was generated by AI, the liability does not rest with the AI itself but with the human lawyers or the law firm that deployed the AI. The prevailing view is that lawyers who use AI to produce legal advice are responsible for verifying its accuracy. If a lawyer provides AI-generated advice without proper oversight and the advice is wrong, the client can sue the lawyer or law firm for professional negligence12.
“Under the current principles of negligence law, it would of course be the lawyers who used the AI to produce their advice who would be sued, if that advice was incorrect. There is simply nobody else for the client to blame.”1
Can You Sue an AI Law Firm Directly?
-
If the law firm is operated by humans who use AI tools, you can sue the law firm for negligence or breach of contract, just as you would with any traditional legal practice12.
-
If the law firm is fully autonomous and operates as a legal entity with no human oversight (a scenario not yet realized in most jurisdictions), current laws do not clearly provide for suing the AI itself. Legal systems generally require a human or corporate defendant12.
-
The law is still catching up with technology, and regulatory frameworks may evolve to address fully autonomous AI legal entities in the future1.
What About Product Liability or Other Claims?
In addition to negligence, other possible claims in AI-related litigation include:
-
Breach of contract (if the AI law firm fails to deliver agreed services)
-
Product liability (if the AI software itself is defective and causes harm)
-
Intellectual property infringement (if the AI unlawfully uses protected content)5.
However, these claims are typically brought against the company or individuals behind the AI, not the AI system itself5.
Recent Legal Precedents
There have been lawsuits involving AI legal research platforms, such as the case of Thomson Reuters suing Ross Intelligence for copyright infringement. However, these cases focus on the conduct of the company operating the AI, not the AI as an independent defendant34.
Key Takeaways
-
You can sue a law firm (or its lawyers) for negligent or incorrect advice, even if that advice was generated by AI12.
-
The law does not currently recognize AI as a legal person, so you cannot sue the AI itself.
-
If an “AI law firm” is a human-run business using AI, your claim would be against the firm or its lawyers.
-
The legal landscape is evolving, and future regulations may address AI autonomy and liability more directly.
In summary, while you cannot sue an AI system as a legal entity, you can sue the law firm or lawyers who use AI in their practice if they fail in their professional duties125.
