How he/she managed this is beyond me..
The solicitor, known only by the pseudonym XX, was not only convicted for the misappropriation of $4,436,763.57 but was also openly defiant of the suspension of his practising certificate and both an interim and final injunction that sought to prevent him from practising.
With the support of two psychologist’s expert evidence, “exceptional orders” were made in criminal proceedings in the District Court and injunctive orders in the Supreme Court to conceal XX’s identity. This order was similarly adopted in the most recent judgment.
The Law Society said due to the causal link between his psychiatric condition and his offending – and a lack of evidence he has or will recover – it warranted a finding he is “unfit to remain on the roll”.