s Ryan Murphy’s new Hulu drama All’s Fair, starring Kim Kardashian and Naomi Watts, turns its lens on a high-powered, all-female law firm, the portrayal of women in family law has taken centre stage. The glossy legal drama (which has been met with mixed critical response in the UK) paints a picture of glamour, rivalry and ambition. Yet behind the questionable acting and TV sheen, London’s real-life female divorce lawyers are quietly reshaping the field in far more substantial ways.
Divorce has always fascinated the public: the heartbreak, the high stakes and the glimpses into the hush-hush private worlds of ultra-high-net-worths. Beyond the sensationalised headlines, however, London’s female family lawyers are leading a somewhat quieter revolution. Some of the capital’s sharpest legal minds are redefining how divorce is practised, negotiated and resolved, rewriting the rules of a space historically dominated by men, blending intellect with emotional intelligence, empathy and authority.
“Female lawyers have had a strong presence in family law since I have been in the business,” says Antonia Mee, co-founder and senior partner at Burgess Mee, a leading London-based firm known for its complex and emotionally charged cases. “My view is that the human element of this area of law attracts women to the profession. An answer I hear frequently in interviews as to why a female candidate wants to be a family lawyer is ‘I want to help people.’ Women have continued to dominate the solicitor side of the profession in terms of numbers.”
When Mee began practising in 2001, the legal landscape for divorcing women was undergoing a transformation. “I started practising family law in 2001. In that year the law changed profoundly for women getting divorced. The case of White and White led to a change in the way the court deals with the division of capital. Until then, the financially weaker party (often the wife) had received a capital award to meet her needs. The House of Lords (as the Supreme Court was then called) in White found that there was no place for discriminating between the traditional gender roles of the husband as the breadwinner and the wife as the homemaker and that both should be treated as having made an equal contribution to the marriage. From then on judges have had to check their capital awards against the yardstick of equality to ensure fairness.”
Read the full article at
