ABC Radio Australia reports…
Fiji attorney-general says Law Society file seizure legal
Updated Mon May 25, 2009
Lawyers in Fiji will have to reapply for licences under the terms and conditions of the President’s latest decree, which stipulates that annual licences issued in February will now expire at the end of June with applications for new ones closing on June the 15th.
Interim attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum maintains that Chief Registrar Anna Rokomokoti’s actions in seizing files from the Law Society offices at the weekend was legal under the new decree.
Read the rest of the report and listen to a inerview with AG Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum dfending the indefensible
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/200905/s2580229.htm
Here’s the official press release by the NZ Law Society on the subject
Media release – Fiji Law Society
Monday, 25 May 2009, 2:56 pm
Press Release: New Zealand Law Society
25 May 2009
Media release – Fiji Law Society
“The Fiji regime’s decision to take over issuing practising certificate for lawyers in Fiji is very disturbing,” the President of the New Zealand Law Society, John Marshall QC, said today (25 May).
By a decree dated Friday 22 May, the Fiji Government has ruled that the Chief Registrar of the Court, a government employee, will take over issuing practising certificates from the Fiji Law Society. The decree says that all existing certificates will expire by the end of June and that lawyers will have to seek renewal from the Registrar before then.
John Marshall said the move was a very serious attack on the independence of the legal profession in Fiji and is of considerable concern.
“An independent legal profession is a vital element of the rule of law. The legal profession represents individuals in claims against the State and defends them in criminal cases brought by the State. Lawyers must be independent of State interference to be able to represent clients freely and fearlessly.
“In New Zealand, the Law Society issues practising certificates to lawyers. The Fiji Law Society has done the same for the last 12 years. We are very concerned to learn that the Fiji Government, through the Chief Registrar, will now decide who should hold a practising certificate.
“We will be watching the situation very closely and we will be extremely concerned if there is any suggestion that lawyers who oppose the regime, or who act for clients who bring cases against it, are being refused practising certificates,” he said.
“The New Zealand Law Society is also very concerned about the process by which these and other wide ranging changes to the regulation of Fiji’s legal profession have been made. There was no consultation, simply the issuing of the decree. Then, at the weekend representatives of the regime arrived at the Fiji Law Society offices to remove files relating to complaints, which, under the decree, will now also be handled by the Registrar,” John Marshall said.
