Abstract: “Constitutional Interpretation in Lawmaking: China’s Invisible Constitutional Enforcement Mechanism”

Tom Ginsburg and Lin Yan have published an article on this general topic.


It is titled “Constitutional Interpretation in Lawmaking: China’s Invisible Constitutional Enforcement Mechanism”  and is well worth a read.


Abstract: It is conventional wisdom that China’s Constitution is unenforceable, and plays little role in China’s legal system, other than as a symbolic document.  This view rests on the fact that the Supreme Court has no power to interpret the Constitution. The formal body with interpretive power, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, has never issued an official interpretation.  Despite this apparent lack of enforcement, we argue that China’s Constitution indeed plays an increasingly important role within the party-state. It does not through the courts but through the legislative process, in which formal requirements of constitutional review have helped the legislature to resolve complex disputes about the relationship among different government organs, the economic system, and even rights claims.  Understanding this hidden mechanism contributes to our knowledge of the internal constitutional workings of authoritarian systems, which differ from those of liberal democracies.