During yesterday’s Epstein hearing, Pam Bondi gave the nation a master class in misleading debate tactics: whataboutism and tu quoque. When asked a hard-hitting question like “Will you take responsibility for breaking the law by sharing the names of Epstein victims?” she responded with “Well, what about Merrick Garland?!”:
Just so we’re clear — responding to “Why didn’t you do your job?” with “Well, the guy before me didn’t either!” doesn’t even fly for line cooks. It definitely shouldn’t work for the United States Attorney General.
When asked why she was protecting a class of rapacious billionaires, she responded by praising the DOW and pulling a “no u” on Jamie Raskin’s trading finesse:
Read the full story at
