Damien Charlotin writes
This database tracks legal decisions1 in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content – typically fake citations, but also other types of arguments. It does not track the (necessarily wider) universe of all fake citations or use of AI in court filings.
While seeking to be exhaustive (394 cases identified so far), it is a work in progress and will expand as new examples emerge. This database has been featured in news media and online posts.2 (Readers may also be interested in this project regarding AI use in academic papers.)
If you know of a case that should be included, feel free to contact me.
Download CSV at
