A tribunal has denied a solicitor accused of improper behaviour over the sending of anti-vaccine letters the chance to bring medical expert witness evidence to her final hearing.
Lois Bayliss applied to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal today to be allowed to adduce expert statements on medicine and ethics when her case is heard next month.
Dr Peter Fields, for Bayliss, said the solicitor had a right to use this evidence to defend herself in the light of assumptions being made in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s case. But the tribunal rejected the application, urging both parties to focus on the nature of the allegations rather than enter into wider discussions about Covid-19 vaccines.
Bayliss, the sole director of Broad Yorkshire Law based in Sheffield, is alleged to have improperly sought to have relied upon her standing and role as a solicitor.
The SRA alleges that over the course of less than three weeks in February 2022, she sent letters to up to 450 individuals at up to 237 schools and GP surgeries threatening that recipients would face criminal and/or civil liability.
Bayliss, who has an unblemished 17-year record as a solicitor, has made it clear that she intends to defend herself against the allegations. A Gofundme page organised by her has raised almost £38,000 through 1,100 donations and has a fundraising target of £200,000. According to the page, this figure is to cover the SRA’s estimated £90,750 costs, defence barrister fees and a ‘potentially substantial fine’.
Read the full report
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/vaccine-campaign-solicitor-denied-chance-to-call-experts-at-sdt/5120650.article?utm_source=gazette_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SDT+says+no+to+vaccine+expert+evidence+%7c+Devolution+of+justice+to+Wales+years+away+%7c+Immigration+lawyers+need+more+than+warm+words_08%2f19%2f2024
Also see
