Advertisement
practicesource.com

Add Social Bookmark

Add to: Webnews Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icoi.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Jumptags Add to: Upchuckr Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Add to: Folkd Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Information
Social Bookmarking
Oh To Be The World's Only IPO Law Firm Print E-mail
Written by Sean Hocking   

Australian Law firm Slater & Gordon must love being the only law firm on the planet to float...

Courting Singles

It seems a week doesn't go by without them getting a mention in one or other of the world's better known publications.

Last week they appeared in an economist article with reference to new UK Legislation which will allow firms to float in the UK in 2011

 

This article in turn has been referenced by the Wall St Journal blog at http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/08/25/lawyers-too-focused-on-the-fine-print-for-public-company-management/

 

We would like to note that the journalist mentions that Slater & Gordon are going Gangbusters. It appears the Rupert effect is taking hold at the WSJ..we've never heard a North American employ that phrase before!

 

Here's the full piece

Lawyers: Too Focused on Fine Print for Public Company Management?

For some, a future of law firm IPOs is a titillating concept. Double-digit growth, low-overhead, and businesses (litigation, restructuring) that can keep revenues afloat during poor deal markets. For others, a Brave New World of publicly-owned law firms would create a comic nightmare of conflict: Would the duty of loyalty be owed to the client or the shareholder?

A story in this week’s Economist suggest another problem: lawyers as business leaders.

The magazine writes:

Clients frustrated with private-practice lawyers often accuse them of lacking commercial nous. Because most lawyers spend much of their time peering at small print, big-picture concerns can go unnoticed. Few managing partners know their firm’s profit per billable hour, even though that is the main product law firms sell. Cost control is often an afterthought, trailing far behind revenue generation.
Furthermore, lawyers have never had to endure the same pressures as the managers of listed companies, where the shareholders call the shots. In law firms, equity is held by a small number of partners. Outside investors are sure to be less sentimental and more critical when analysing a firm’s performance. For law firms that do decide to go public, success will depend on their managers’ ability to run them as public companies, rather than members-only gentlemen’s clubs.

Countries are splitting over the issue. Last year, the Australian firm of Slater & Gordon (no relation) became the world’s first publicly-traded law firm, and has done gangbusters ever since, enjoying a 50% share increase and acquiring six smaller firms. A recent change in British law will, by 2011, enable law firms to use business structures other than private partnerships, and allow for external investment and IPOs. Back home, the concept hasn’t caught on. ABA Model Rule 5.4 prohibits firms from selling equity shares in law firms to non-lawyers. Specifically, it says that a lawyer shall not share legal fees with a non-lawyer.

 
< Prev   Next >

Playing your business cards with tact is important while applying for loans, particularly when the amount of personal loans is large and the credit card is no good.

Untitled